Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Climate Red - News and Views on Climate Change Issues.

The Climate Institute warns on Emissions trading policy

May 28th 2007 06:21
The Climate Institute warns on Emissions trading policy

Pretty good article to get a clear picture on how inaction will hurt our hip pockets directly. click here for full article

Like I have said before nothing like the bottom line to wake us all up into wanting the Government to do something. These guys are saying our electricity prices will go up if the government does nothing or takes a light handed approach to Carbon Pricing.
They also make a comment on the nuclear power issue saying that Nuclear power isn’t really a viable solution to the problem. Here is an extract from the article but its worth a read in its entirety.


Only days until the PM’s roundtable submissions are due.
Part of the Yahoo Article
Making significant cuts to greenhouse gases from our electricity sector is affordable and achievable if we act now with a realistic carbon emissions trading scheme, a market-based clean energy target and comprehensive energy efficiency policies," Mr Connor said.
"Accounting for 30 per cent of Australia's overall greenhouse pollution, our electricity sector needs to make a decisive switch to clean energy but it should be backed up with an economy-wide approach that links into international carbon markets."
Wholesale electricity prices under the wait-and-see approach would rise from $38 per megawatt-hour in 2008 to only $46 from 2010-2020 but nearly double to $87 in 2031-40.
Under the mixed scenario, the price would initially soar to $63/MWh in 2010-20 and reach $73 in 2031-40.
The report says the inclusion of even a moderate energy efficiency program with a trading scheme would reduce the electricity sector's cost of achieving the reduction target by near 50 per cent, or about $12 billion.

It also says introducing nuclear power would make only a modest contribution to reducing emissions by 2050 because of the time it would take to establish the new power source.
53
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
11 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
260 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

akd545's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by akd545
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]