Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Climate Red - News and Views on Climate Change Issues.

its official: we have to become vegetarians

January 16th 2008 01:42
We have all worked out that lifestyle changes are needed to reduce our Carbon Footprint, now the IPCC President has finally released the dreaded news: what we actually have to do as individuals to make even a small dent; For us dedicated meat eaters it aint pretty....apparently they were too afraid to say anything before even tho it was there in black and white

"This is something that the IPCC was afraid to say earlier, but now we have said it."


We have to become vegatarians....ouch...Maybe we can just eat less food the days we want to eat meat or something, anything....... boo hoo

Please read on for the article or here is the link CLICK HERE

Lifestyle changes can curb climate change: IPCC chief
4 hours ago

PARIS (AFP) — Don't eat meat, ride a bike, and be a frugal shopper -- that's how you can help brake global warming, the head of the United Nation's Nobel Prize-winning scientific panel on climate change said Tuesday.

The 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), issued last year, highlights "the importance of lifestyle changes," said Rajendra Pachauri at a press conference in Paris.

"This is something that the IPCC was afraid to say earlier, but now we have said it."

A vegetarian, the Indian economist made a plea for people around the world to tame their carnivorous impulses.

"Please eat less meat -- meat is a very carbon intensive commodity," he said, adding that consuming large quantities was also bad for one's health.

Studies have shown that producing one kilo (2.2 pounds) of meat causes the emissions equivalent of 36.4 kilos of carbon dioxide.

In addition, raising and transporting that slab of beef, lamb or pork requires the same amount of energy as lighting a 100-watt bulb for nearly three weeks.

In listing ways that individuals can contribute to the fight against global warming, Pachauri praised the system of communal, subscriber-access bikes in Paris and other French cities as a "wonderful development."

"Instead of jumping in a car to go 500 meters, if we use a bike or walk it will make an enormous difference," he told journalists at a press conference.

Another lifestyle change that can help, he continued, was not buying things "simply because they are available." He urged consumers to only purchase what they really need.

Since the Nobel was awarded in October to the IPCC and the former US vice president Al Gore, Pachauri has criss-crossed the globe sounding the alarm on the dangers of global warming.

"The picture is quite grim -- if the human race does not do anything, climate change will have serious impacts," he warned Tuesday.

At the same time, however, he said he was encouraged by the outcome of UN-brokered climate change negotiations in Bali last month, and by the prospect of a new administration in Washington.

"The final statement clearly mentions deep cuts in emissions in greenhouse gases. I don't think people can run away from that terminology," he said.

The Bali meeting set the framework for a global agreement on how to reduce the output of carbon dioxide and other gases generated by human activity that are driving climate change.

Pachauri also sees cause for optimism in the fact that, for the first time since the world's nations began meeting over the issue of global warming in 1994, "nobody questioned the findings of the IPCC."

"The science has clearly become the basis for action on climate change," he said.

In 2007, the IPCC issued a massive report the size of three phone books on the reality and risks of climate change, its 4th assessment in 18 years.

Pachauri said it was too late for Washington to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, the sole international treaty mandating cuts in CO2 emissions.

The United States is the only industrialised country not to have made such commitments.

But he remained hopeful the US -- under a new administration -- would be a "core signatory" of any new agreement.

"With the change that is taking place politically in the US, the chances of that happening are certainly much better than was the case a few months ago," he said.

At 67, Pachauri said he has not yet decided whether to take on a second five-year mandate as IPCC head. Elections take place in September.

On the one hand, he said, the experience he has acquired would serve him well.

But the advantage of retiring, he said with a smile, is that his carbon footprint -- the amount of C02 emissions generated by all this travels -- would be greatly reduced.

bad bad cows

cheers

Louie
IPCC says become a vegetarian

114
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
17 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Pat

January 16th 2008 03:26
If we stop eating meat, then we are deciding to MURDER every single cow on the planet because we wouldn't be reducing any greenhouse gas emissions otherwise.

I'm ok with this, just saying is all. Cows are worthless animals anyway.

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 03:30
theoretically I guess but can't we just drink more milk? A lot of the Emissions are in the transport etc, not the fact they exist...just a thought....

i don't think I can come to terms with being a Veg, I am going to look for other ways to make a difference.

cheers

Louie

Comment by Howard

January 16th 2008 03:31
Why don't they just tell us to all eat doggie-goo? When will people stop listening to these green "limousine liberals." It's back to the Middle Ages and the Dark Ages.

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 04:52
ha.....Howard have you read Ben Elton's book BLind Faith...hillarious and pretty much agrees with you....

And yes well we might have to eat Doggie-Goo when Peter Garret bans plastic bags.....

Comment by Pat

January 16th 2008 05:17
What the hell are you maniacs talking about? Drink more milk?!

Yeah, there is heaps of emissions in the transport, but a large part of the problem is the actual gas that a living cow produces, not to mention the inefficiency of growing food to feed to cattle to effectively grow a different type of food (ie. meat).

I think the vegetarian argument is based on the idea that it is more efficient that we just eat the grain (or a similarly produced grain) that we would otherwise feed cattle and I don't think that that is a ridiculous idea at all!

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 05:20
hehehe Pat, the milk comment was a joke, I was trying to think of a way to save the poor cows from being slaughtered..not that they aren't already for our food consumption.... all very chilled in these hills

Comment by Pat

January 16th 2008 05:37
oh ok, I see now, but I wasn't getting too worked up anyway. I hate the environment and wish it the worst, but I just like arguing with people and being difficult.

I just wish there was a way to kill all the cows and STILL somehow hurt the environment in the process.

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 05:52
noice...i think all you have to do is eat a big mac for brekky lunch and dinner and you can achieve your goal.......happy days

Comment by Michaelie

January 16th 2008 08:55
Oh Jaysus, so not going to happen! Plus, my parents have a beef farm so I can't go turning veg on them.

Now I feel like steak.

Michaelie

Comment by Mountain Fog

January 16th 2008 13:00
...poor bloody moo cows...all farty bottoms and increasing greenhouse gases, well, what if we invent a food that they like which does not produce farty bottoms and burpies???

Maybe we could put them all under domes, (will have to soon anyway because of the rapidly increasing long wave ultra violet...more about that later...) and then we pump out all the farties and burpies, which rise to the dome's ceiling and then use that to power turbines to make electricity!

Sadly, I love red meat too...but eat it very rarely now, as I look after mumsy who doesn't eat red meat, but, CHICKENS!!!! Another story there.

Anyway, being a veggo better prepares us for our soon to arrive new neighbours, coming to a solar system near you...but more seriously...

a great friend of mine, who is a professor in botanical sciences, (and a Harvard grad at that!...oohh ahhhh..), anyhoo, he told me yesterday that he has started to notice a change in leaves, they are getting bleached. Not those plants with lots of tanin, but ones that do not contain much tanin....this is REALLY bad news I am afraid.

He promises to get back to me soon, hopefully he will know more in a week or so, I will let you know what he says...maybe privately first, and you can decide what to say about it. He is also starting radio therapy for cancer of the prostrate in a couple of weeks...poor chap, but he is very spiritual, which is interesting for a biologist/botanist scientist of his calibre.

Anyhoo, good to read you again gurrlish!

cheers

fog

Comment by Cibbuano

January 16th 2008 21:59

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 22:54
Cib I know, total dilemma, like i said surely there can be other sacrfices made

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 22:56
Michaelie, no way you can give up meat, you have to support your parents, you can do pennance some other way......

cheers

Louie

Comment by Louie

January 16th 2008 22:58
fog,

sorry to hear about your friend, hope he is ok.

Def let me know about the bleaching, sounds a bit scary, might be an issue for Lilla to sink her teeth into as to the hows and thw whys.

thanks for dropping by, good to see you

cheers

Louie

Comment by Howard

January 17th 2008 03:03
Don't worry, with the right economic program in the United States and the leading powers, we can colonize Mars soon, and eat hydroponic food. Plus, after we do that, we can raise cattle there.

Greenies are such pessimistic creeps.

Comment by Louie

January 17th 2008 03:08

Comment by Kim Lock

March 13th 2008 04:15
Intensive farming of anything is bad for the environment. Over fertilisation of crops sends toxic run off into our rivers and water sources... Transporting and storing fruits and veges, not to mention the harvesting and processing of grains have tremendous energy requirements. Clearly the only way to alleviate the greenhous emissions we (as a collective) produce from our various efforts to survive in such numbers, is to reduce the human population. Anyone volunteering to be among the reduced??

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
9 Posts
12 Posts
13 Posts
209 Posts dating from May 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Louie's Blogs

3231 Vote(s)
176 Comment(s)
39 Post(s)
263 Vote(s)
14 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
1575 Vote(s)
126 Comment(s)
25 Post(s)
153 Vote(s)
11 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Moderated by Louie
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]