they just can't help themselves
June 25th 2008 01:48
Oh we are back here again, by here I mean politics, the Libs just can't help themselves.
They are now criticizing the Government on their emissions trading scheme - a scheme that we haven't even seen the Green paper on yet might I add. They are trying to say the governent isn't really capable of building an effective scheme- this would be the scheme that the Liberals denied we even needed until they realised it was an election issue -
Its no secret I am not a huge Labor fan, however Penny Wong is on the job and is more than capable of building an efficient and effective scheme, trying to spook the Australian people out of an emissions trading scheme we need, in the guise of concern over petrol prices is well, apart from annoying, just plan underhanded. They are about up there with the mining company lobbyists in my books.
Again, I say, the Environment should be bi-partisan and we should all work together to reduce our emissions, which rose 1.6% last year btw. Grandstanding and mud slinging should not be on the agenda, save it for such things of National importance as the Iguanagate affair.
Here is a link and an extract from a story that reports on our emissions from last year and snippets from Parliament yesterday.
They are now criticizing the Government on their emissions trading scheme - a scheme that we haven't even seen the Green paper on yet might I add. They are trying to say the governent isn't really capable of building an effective scheme- this would be the scheme that the Liberals denied we even needed until they realised it was an election issue -
Its no secret I am not a huge Labor fan, however Penny Wong is on the job and is more than capable of building an efficient and effective scheme, trying to spook the Australian people out of an emissions trading scheme we need, in the guise of concern over petrol prices is well, apart from annoying, just plan underhanded. They are about up there with the mining company lobbyists in my books.
Again, I say, the Environment should be bi-partisan and we should all work together to reduce our emissions, which rose 1.6% last year btw. Grandstanding and mud slinging should not be on the agenda, save it for such things of National importance as the Iguanagate affair.
Here is a link and an extract from a story that reports on our emissions from last year and snippets from Parliament yesterday.
Climate Change Minister Penny Wong says Australia is on track to meet its Kyoto targets for greenhouse gas emissions, but the nation has a lot more work to do.
Ms Wong released a government report which found Australia's emissions in 2007 were 585 million tonnes, or 106 per cent of 1990 levels.
This meant the country was on track to meet its Kyoto commitments, she said.
But she noted emissions were continuing to rise, saying this was a concern.
Emissions were 1.6 per cent higher than the previous year, according to the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2006 report, issued by the Department of Climate Change.
"What (the report) shows is that Australia, while still on track to meet our Kyoto target, it's clear we have a lot of work to do when it comes to reducing our greenhouse-gas emissions," Senator Wong told reporters.
She reiterated the government's commitment to an emissions trading scheme.
"What we know is climate change is happening. The economically responsible thing to deal with it is to introduce an emissions trading scheme," she said.
"We have to tackle it."
Senator Wong would not be drawn on whether petrol and agriculture would be covered by the scheme, which is to start operating in 2010.
But she did take aim at the opposition for "scare-mongering" over the impact of the ETS on petrol prices.
The opposition raised concerns on Monday that petrol could rise by as much as 25 cents a litre in the short-term, and questioned whether a new tax on petrol was the best way to go.
The report showed Australia was only on track to meet its Kyoto targets because of "land-use changes", which outweighed significant increases in emissions in almost all other sectors.
Emissions from transport and energy soared 40 per cent between 1990 and 2006.
Electricity was the worst offender with emissions jumping 47 per cent since 1990.
Transport was next in line, with emissions rising 27 per cent in that time.
The report found Australia generated 1.5 per cent of global emissions.
Meanwhile, The federal coalition says it is committed to an emissions trading scheme but remains concerned about the Rudd government's ability to implement it without "crashing the economy".
The government's response to climate change was based on ideology and spin, it said.
The coalition wanted an environmentally and economically responsible approach to dealing with climate change, treasury spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said.
"The emissions trading scheme was part of our policy last year and remains our policy today," he told Sky News.
"The implementation of it is something that has to be fine-tuned to ensure that you get the right result for the environment, but you don't crash the economy.
"The concern that I have is that the Rudd government's response to climate change is essentially ideological, it's based on ideology and it's based on spin."
bla bla de bla blaMs Wong released a government report which found Australia's emissions in 2007 were 585 million tonnes, or 106 per cent of 1990 levels.
This meant the country was on track to meet its Kyoto commitments, she said.
But she noted emissions were continuing to rise, saying this was a concern.
Emissions were 1.6 per cent higher than the previous year, according to the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2006 report, issued by the Department of Climate Change.
"What (the report) shows is that Australia, while still on track to meet our Kyoto target, it's clear we have a lot of work to do when it comes to reducing our greenhouse-gas emissions," Senator Wong told reporters.
She reiterated the government's commitment to an emissions trading scheme.
"What we know is climate change is happening. The economically responsible thing to deal with it is to introduce an emissions trading scheme," she said.
"We have to tackle it."
Senator Wong would not be drawn on whether petrol and agriculture would be covered by the scheme, which is to start operating in 2010.
But she did take aim at the opposition for "scare-mongering" over the impact of the ETS on petrol prices.
The opposition raised concerns on Monday that petrol could rise by as much as 25 cents a litre in the short-term, and questioned whether a new tax on petrol was the best way to go.
The report showed Australia was only on track to meet its Kyoto targets because of "land-use changes", which outweighed significant increases in emissions in almost all other sectors.
Emissions from transport and energy soared 40 per cent between 1990 and 2006.
Electricity was the worst offender with emissions jumping 47 per cent since 1990.
Transport was next in line, with emissions rising 27 per cent in that time.
The report found Australia generated 1.5 per cent of global emissions.
Meanwhile, The federal coalition says it is committed to an emissions trading scheme but remains concerned about the Rudd government's ability to implement it without "crashing the economy".
The government's response to climate change was based on ideology and spin, it said.
The coalition wanted an environmentally and economically responsible approach to dealing with climate change, treasury spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said.
"The emissions trading scheme was part of our policy last year and remains our policy today," he told Sky News.
"The implementation of it is something that has to be fine-tuned to ensure that you get the right result for the environment, but you don't crash the economy.
"The concern that I have is that the Rudd government's response to climate change is essentially ideological, it's based on ideology and it's based on spin."
| 168 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog














Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
Comment by KylieW
Celebrity Obsession
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
we are making it (always have been BTW) by the skin of our teeth only due to some landuse re-assignment giving us a windfall, trust me outside of that we as individuals and corporations have a long way to go.
Meeting our next targets and actually making a difference wont be so easy which is why we need to get moving now.
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Comment by Market Newbie
Gizmo Peek
Stock Market Punk
Comment by RubySoho
Music Zone
Thought Zone
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Honestly they have NO CLUE, and trust me, I am not a fan of Labor but they are winning my vote by DEFAULT
Comment by Morgan Bell
Science News
Deep Pencil
Business News
Movie Train
Artist Quirk
rather than taxing petrol they should be lifting taxes and provifing subsidies as incentives for businesses to mass-produce solar panels and non-petrol fueled cars
the Labor party always seems so content to say "well sure we are doing much good but the Liberals dont either so we are justified in our inaction"
they are like little kiddies in the playground!
Comment by Wally
Wally's World
Some interesting facts:
Really Long Link
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
I do beg to differ, the sceptics do get plenty of time in the sun in the media. Take for example the Australian Financial Review ran a special Carbon lift out three weeks ago, it was completely anti-climate change. My point has always been it doesn't matter, the world needs to clean up their act, Climate Change has raised awareness so we all look in our own backyards and realise how much we WASTE. Don't forget the millions that can be made from developing renewable energy and kicking the oil and coal habit. also don't forget the sceptics are often lobbyists for the big polluters.
cheers
Comment by Bill Green
Talking Headlines
Comment by katyzzz
Photography Tips
MS Paint Art
Even the red did not beckon me.
Political issues, they're all alike. Politicians are like your underwear, should be changed regularly. Whatever issue will collect votes, they are on to it. None are free of this motto 'the only thing politician's can do is count votes.
Comment by Market Newbie
Gizmo Peek
Stock Market Punk
Let's not just wiggle out of it.
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
its way too important
Comment by Wally
Wally's World
All 31,000 of them?
This climate change agenda will cost taxpayers money. We should make sure 100% we are the reason for it.
95% of Victoria's energy is provided by brown goal.
Global warming? The global temperature has not increased since 1998.
Sea level rises? The sea levels have stopped rising. Are we still going to drown, Penny?
Cheers.
Comment by Bill Green
Talking Headlines
Problem is individuals think profits can be made from climate change. Any revolution (and this is a weather revolution) creates social dysfunction. All those assets the banks are holding onto are vulnerable to the whims of the weather. Individuals and institutions will lose faith in assets.
And Wally the sea levels haven't stopped rising. No ice in the Arctic by 2013 (from Earl de Blonville, led Australia's first Arctic expedition and another four), and then there is still the Antarctic on the melt.
Or have I missed something? Is there a hiatus?
Comment by Louie
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Now there's an idea.
Comment by Wally
Wally's World
According to the University of Colorado, the sea levels have stopped rising.
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
Comment by Market Newbie
Gizmo Peek
Stock Market Punk
There was a time when the summer months are really summer months in the Philippines. Lately, summer months have become "typhoon months." There was a time when a 120Kph typhoon was already considered very strong here. These days, what, 140, 190, 220?
So, the scientists cannot agree. I don't care, they have their own egos and reputations to protect. Not everything that cannot be proven true are false. Sometimes, the other guys are just more persuasive in presenting their arguments.
I will not argue with the taxes that are being levied against Australians on this matter since I will not be affected by it (since I am not an Australian and I am not in Australia). But when the weather is no longer the way it used to be, and when the areas that used to be free from floods now go underwater and the lives and properties therein are destroyed, and when the weather patterns become too devastatingly brutal... the way they have become lately, and the way it continues to become even more destructive...
Well, we can all continue arguing until we all die... or we can die trying to do something to save some lives.
Everybody has a free choice. Make yours.
Comment by Lilla
From The Home Front
Enviro Warrior
Dream Herald
Esoteric Bookshop
Couldn't agree more...too bad we can;t get the conglomerates into the act as well, with some changes to the manufacturing processes still being used... belching quaffs of stuff into the air, unchecked... when-o-when in this carbon tax happening?
Another $2 million for researcha nd surveys for Penny's office I see... and still some papers to appear... I hope they hurry becuase the people will not remember it was the Libs indeed, who sold us out to the highest pollution belchers...
Makes me boil.
Lilla ...