Bush Fire or spark in the right direction?
August 5th 2007 02:02
I guess its no surprise that Bush's recent invitation to the World's largest polluters has been greeted with audible eye rolling from the Greenies and Silent Groans from heads of State. Let's hope this is a spark in the right direction and not the beginning of the end for Global agreement on Climate Change.
The Greenies are frustrated as are the Heads of state that of course the moment Mr Bush wants to get on board the Green boat it has to be his boat, forget perfectly good upcoming global forums for discussion; APEC in September and the UN Conference in November; it has to be George W's idea and has to be in his sand pit.
All of a sudden going green is a good idea. Now this blog is groaning. This band wagon is getting mighty crowded with recent converts. I am not saying this is a bad thing, it should be a good thing except for the small detail of Politics and the fact that of course the Geroge W wants to reinvent this wheel. Forget that Eurpoe and the rest of the World- except for the U.S and Australia has been running with a perfectly good and successful system for quite some time now- we need a new one.
Maybe this is all a ploy for Bush to successfully avoid the issue at the APEC conference, maybe he isn't equiped to talk about this with the world leaders; he is merely giving a speech at the September 27/28 conference in Washington, Condoleze Rice is running the show; Does this totally scream of a man who doesn't know the subject and needs to be on familiar ground to deal with it, with a speech written by someone else?Tthis doesn't bother me except he is the leader of the Free world and this is the most important issue of our generation- still. You would like to think he would want to debate the topic every waking hour; and be able to.
Anyhow who am I to look a gift horse in the mouth, the end game here is that we need a solution for the sake of the Planet and future generations (love melodrama on a sunday mornming) let's hope the Greenies are wrong and the U.S. provides solutions not a whole heap of spanners in the very delecate works of the Treaty that is Kyoto and the system that is still taking baby steps towards a solution. Here is the story with the announcment by George W and the details of the conference.
The Greenies are frustrated as are the Heads of state that of course the moment Mr Bush wants to get on board the Green boat it has to be his boat, forget perfectly good upcoming global forums for discussion; APEC in September and the UN Conference in November; it has to be George W's idea and has to be in his sand pit.
All of a sudden going green is a good idea. Now this blog is groaning. This band wagon is getting mighty crowded with recent converts. I am not saying this is a bad thing, it should be a good thing except for the small detail of Politics and the fact that of course the Geroge W wants to reinvent this wheel. Forget that Eurpoe and the rest of the World- except for the U.S and Australia has been running with a perfectly good and successful system for quite some time now- we need a new one.
Maybe this is all a ploy for Bush to successfully avoid the issue at the APEC conference, maybe he isn't equiped to talk about this with the world leaders; he is merely giving a speech at the September 27/28 conference in Washington, Condoleze Rice is running the show; Does this totally scream of a man who doesn't know the subject and needs to be on familiar ground to deal with it, with a speech written by someone else?Tthis doesn't bother me except he is the leader of the Free world and this is the most important issue of our generation- still. You would like to think he would want to debate the topic every waking hour; and be able to.
Anyhow who am I to look a gift horse in the mouth, the end game here is that we need a solution for the sake of the Planet and future generations (love melodrama on a sunday mornming) let's hope the Greenies are wrong and the U.S. provides solutions not a whole heap of spanners in the very delecate works of the Treaty that is Kyoto and the system that is still taking baby steps towards a solution. Here is the story with the announcment by George W and the details of the conference.
Bush bid on climate under fire
Email
Print
Normal font
Large font
Olivier Knox, Washington
August 5, 2007
AdvertisementAdvertisement
US PRESIDENT George Bush has invited the world's big polluters, including Australia, to a conference next month to set long-term goals on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
Environmental groups have called the plan a diversion from other efforts to combat global warming. But Washington says it complements UN-driven talks on the issue.
The summit, conceived as a forum to discuss ways to halt the rise in global temperatures and show Mr Bush's recent embrace of the issue of climate change, will not signal any change in US policies.
Mr Bush opposes mandatory curbs on greenhouse gas emissions and emphasises the development of clean technology over energy conservation.
"We expect to place special emphasis on how major economies can accelerate the development and deployment of clean technologies, a critical component of an effective global approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions," he said in the invitation letter.
Mr Bush has asked Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa and South Korea to send representatives to Washington for the September 27-28 meeting.
Mr Bush also invited delegations from Europe and the United Nations.
The Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, will host the talks and Mr Bush will address the meeting.
"The United States is committed to collaborating with other major economies to agree on a detailed contribution for a new global framework by the end of 2008, which would contribute to a global agreement under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change by 2009," Mr Bush said.
Like Australia, the US the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases has refused to ratify the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which mandates cuts in the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. It expires in 2012.
Mr Bush has cited the pact's exemptions for China and India as developing nations from mandatory greenhouse gas targets as a chief reason for not submitting the protocol for Senate ratification. Both countries are big consumers of oil, gas and coal.
Presidential spokesman Scott Stanzel dismissed a question from a reporter about whether the White House conference was aimed at competing with or deflecting attention from a UN meeting scheduled for September 24. He said the meeting was "intended to aid the UN process".
The Union of Concerned Scientists advocacy group said that, given Mr Bush's opposition to Kyoto, the world wanted to see whether he would "put any meaningful proposals on the table".
"Binding commitments to reduce emissions, together with policies that put a price on global warming pollution, are needed to get the job done," the union's director of strategy and policy, Alden Meyer, said.
"Until President Bush is willing to accept this reality, the process he is launching next month is unlikely to make any significant contribution to addressing the climate crisis."
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week appealed for a new climate change deal by 2009, coming into force by the time the Kyoto protocol expires.
UN talks on a new protocol will begin in earnest at a conference in Bali in December.
Prime Minister John Howard has flagged climate change as a big topic of talks at the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum in Sydney next month, which Mr Bush is scheduled to attend.
AFP, WASHINGTON POST
Normal font
Large font
Olivier Knox, Washington
August 5, 2007
AdvertisementAdvertisement
US PRESIDENT George Bush has invited the world's big polluters, including Australia, to a conference next month to set long-term goals on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
Environmental groups have called the plan a diversion from other efforts to combat global warming. But Washington says it complements UN-driven talks on the issue.
The summit, conceived as a forum to discuss ways to halt the rise in global temperatures and show Mr Bush's recent embrace of the issue of climate change, will not signal any change in US policies.
Mr Bush opposes mandatory curbs on greenhouse gas emissions and emphasises the development of clean technology over energy conservation.
"We expect to place special emphasis on how major economies can accelerate the development and deployment of clean technologies, a critical component of an effective global approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions," he said in the invitation letter.
Mr Bush has asked Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa and South Korea to send representatives to Washington for the September 27-28 meeting.
Mr Bush also invited delegations from Europe and the United Nations.
The Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, will host the talks and Mr Bush will address the meeting.
"The United States is committed to collaborating with other major economies to agree on a detailed contribution for a new global framework by the end of 2008, which would contribute to a global agreement under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change by 2009," Mr Bush said.
Like Australia, the US the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases has refused to ratify the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which mandates cuts in the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. It expires in 2012.
Mr Bush has cited the pact's exemptions for China and India as developing nations from mandatory greenhouse gas targets as a chief reason for not submitting the protocol for Senate ratification. Both countries are big consumers of oil, gas and coal.
Presidential spokesman Scott Stanzel dismissed a question from a reporter about whether the White House conference was aimed at competing with or deflecting attention from a UN meeting scheduled for September 24. He said the meeting was "intended to aid the UN process".
The Union of Concerned Scientists advocacy group said that, given Mr Bush's opposition to Kyoto, the world wanted to see whether he would "put any meaningful proposals on the table".
"Binding commitments to reduce emissions, together with policies that put a price on global warming pollution, are needed to get the job done," the union's director of strategy and policy, Alden Meyer, said.
"Until President Bush is willing to accept this reality, the process he is launching next month is unlikely to make any significant contribution to addressing the climate crisis."
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week appealed for a new climate change deal by 2009, coming into force by the time the Kyoto protocol expires.
UN talks on a new protocol will begin in earnest at a conference in Bali in December.
Prime Minister John Howard has flagged climate change as a big topic of talks at the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum in Sydney next month, which Mr Bush is scheduled to attend.
AFP, WASHINGTON POST
| 67 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog














Comment by Nickoftime's Sanity Corner
*rolls eyes* puhleaseee...Bush and environmentalism? That's like trying to mix heavy processed oil and pure spring water...
The spring water of course, is just like a clean environment...a completely light, natural element, that's good for you and is something that every living creature on the planet needs in order to survive and stay healthy....
The oil, however, is like our dear fearful tearful leader Georgie Porgie...Heavy, greasy, undigestible, chemically altered, unnatural, bad for every living thing on the planet, and something none of us even needs...
If he thinks he's going to up his popularity ratings by jumping on the conservation or environmental bandwagon, he can just forget it...We're all full up here...
No one in their right mind will ever fall for it anyway...
Great read though!
But if he is so concerned about cutting down on gas emmissions, then why doesn't he just try keeping his big fat mouth shut for a while?
I'll believe it when I see it...just like those invisible weapons of mass destruction...
*rolls eyes again*
Take care,
Nick
Comment by Louie
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Well after I wrote this post I had a sudden flash of reason.......Georgie is thinking about the future....He beat Al Gore by a dishonest heartbeat way back when.,...but look who is on top, Al Gore has made $100m during this time. All GeorgeW has done is kill young men and spend Billions of other people's money....he wants to get richer than rich post his retirement from the Whitehouse and get on the Climate Change gravy train....maybe he isnt as dumb as we all think...oh yeah no-one will buy that craaap from him.......just a thoery
Comment by Nickoftime's Sanity Corner
nice thought, but Bush is a card carrying member of the Illuminati and a 33rd degree Freemason, what are the odds that man is ever going to have to worry about where his next meal is coming from?
Oh and by the way, Gore is also in the 'Boys Club'...
So if one prospers, they all do! None of them will ever have to worry about money for the rest of their natural lives....
LOL
Reptiles for lunch anyone...?
*Snicker*
Thinking outside the box,
Nick
Comment by Louie
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
And oh I get it, they strive for immortailty by giving to the Earth and being "good men" money is nothing anymore so it becomes about Ego...anything you can do I can do better....maybe Gore will run again......
Comment by katyzzz
Photography Tips
MS Paint Art
Don't let your fingers run away with you on the typing.
katyzzz
Comment by Louie
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips